Forming solid electrolyte interphase in situ in an ionic conducting Li1.5Al0.5Ge1.5(PO4)3-polypropylene (PP) based separator for Li-ion batteries
Wu Jiao-Yang1, Ling Shi-Gang1, Yang Qi1, Li Hong1, †, , Xu Xiao-Xiong2, Chen Li-Quan1
Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Ningbo Institute of Material Technology Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang 315201, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: hli@iphy.ac.cn

Project supported by the Beijing Science and Technology Project, China (Grant No. Z13111000340000), the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2012CB932900), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51325206 and 51421002).

Abstract
Abstract

A new concept of forming solid electrolyte interphases (SEI) in situ in an ionic conducting Li1.5Al0.5Ge1.5(PO4)3-polypropylene (LAGP-PP) based separator during charging and discharging is proposed and demonstrated. This unique structure shows a high ionic conductivity, low interface resistance with electrode, and can suppress the growth of lithium dendrite. The features of forming the SEI in situ are investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The results confirm that SEI films mainly consist of lithium fluoride and carbonates with various alkyl contents. The cell assembled by using the LAGP-coated separator demonstrates a good cycling performance even at high charging rates, and the lithium dendrites were not observed on the lithium metal electrode. Therefore, the SEI-LAGP-PP separator can be used as a promising flexible solid electrolyte for solid state lithium batteries.

1. Introduction

Energy and environment are the two serious issues, therefore developing clean and renewable energy resources is our urgent work.[1] Lithium ion batteries (LIBs) are a kind of green energy battery which represents the future development direction. It has been widely used in portable electronic devices, electric vehicles, and stationary type distributed power sources.[2] However, conventional lithium ion batteries with flammable non-aqueous electrolytes have safety risks. Nevertheless, solid state lithium ion batteries are considered to be the ultimate solution for improving the safety performance.[3] In order to satisfy large scale manufacturing, many efforts are paid to fabricate solid electrolytes which have both the flexible feature and good electrochemical properties.[4]

Polymer electrolytes, polymer-inorganic composite electrolytes, and inorganic ceramic electrolytes are developed as solid electrolytes systems. High molecular weight polymer hosts have been studied, especially for the poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)-based polymer electrolytes. However, in the dry solid polymer electrolyte system (PEO–LiX), it exhibits very low ionic conductivity on the order of 10−6 S·cm−1 at room temperature.[5] This lower conductivity excludes this type of membrane from practical applications at room temperature. The most common approach to enhance the conductivity of dry solid polymer electrolyte is to add inorganic nano-particles into the polymer host. The ceramic fillers are generally divided into two categories: inactive fillers that are not involved in the lithium ion conduction process (e.g., Al2O3[6] and SiO2[7]) and active ones that participate in lithium ion transport (e.g., Li3N[8] and Li7La3Zr2O12[9]). Croce et al.[10] reported the conductivities of a PEO–LiClO4 mixture containing nano-powders of TiO2 and Al2O3 can reach 10−4 S·cm−1 at 50 °C and 10−5 S·cm−1 at 30 °C, respectively. However, with the addition of inorganic nano-particles, it accelerated deterioration of the electrolyte’s mechanical properties.[9] Kamaya et al.[11] reported a lithium superionic conductor Li10GeP2S12 that had a new three-dimensional framework structure. It exhibited an extremely high lithium ionic conductivity of 1.2 × 10−2 S·cm−1 at room temperature. While the sulfide electrolytes are not stable in the air, it can react with water and produce poisonous gas. Also inorganic ceramic is not flexible compared with polymer and is fragile, which is much more difficult to handle than polymer-based solid membranes.[12] Luo et al.[13] found that a 4–5 μm thick solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer could be formed on a well-defined silicon nanocone surface. This SEI layer can be used as a composite solid electrolyte for solid lithium batteries.

Recently, Xu et al.[14] reported an ionic conductor Li1.5Al0.5Ge1.5(PO4)3 (LAGP) coated on the surface of a PP separator. In contrast with other inorganic coatings, such as Al2O3, TiO2, ZnO, and ZrO2,[15,16] LAGP is an excellent lithium ion conductor, which allows the rapid diffusion of lithium ion through the coating layer. Therefore, it could reduce the ionic resistance compared to the inert ceramic coated separator.[17,18] The coating layer LAGP helps to give a high ion conductivity. Besides, the cell assembled by using the LAGP coating separator shows a superior rate capability and cycle ability in high-voltage cathode materials up to 5 V. For this type of ionic conductor coated separator (ICCS), the ionic conductor exists as contacted particles and the high ionic conductivity in bulk phase may not be useful.

Herein, the authors propose a new strategy by in-situ growing SEI on the surface of ionic conducting Li1.5Al0.5Ge1.5(PO4)3-polypropylene based (LAGP-PP) separator for the first time. With the decomposition of electrolytes during the charge/discharge process, the SEI layer formed on the LAGP-PP separator became thicker and thicker, and the artificial SEI-LAGP-PP structure was obtained eventually. This structure has the functionality of a solid electrolyte layer, i.e., preventing electronic conduction but providing lithium ion conducting properties as an electrolyte.[1921] The separator shows excellent ionic conductivity, good cycling performance, and high rate capability. The morphology and composition of the artificial SEI-LAGP-PP structure and the surface morphology of Li electrode are explored and discussed.

2. Experiment

The LAGP-PP separator was reported by Xu et al.[14] The cathode was a commercial product with a composition of LiCoO2, conductive acetylene black, and polyvinylidenefluoride (PVDF KynarFlex 2801, Atochem) at a weight ratio of 93:4:3 (Amperex Technology Limited). The cathode sheets with dimensions of 8 mm×8 mm were prepared, and kept in a 120 °C oven for 6 h. The active material loading was 16.625 mg·cm−2. The liquid electrolyte was composed of 1M LiPF6 in ethylene carbonate (EC) and dimethyl carbonate (DMC) (1:1 by volume) with vinylene carbonate (VC) as the film-forming additive (2 wt%).

The CR2032 coin cells were assembled in an argon gas filled glove box (H2O and O2 < 0.1 ppm). The charge/discharge cycling performances were measured at room temperature using a Land BT2000 Battery Test System (Wuhan, China) in the voltage range of 3 V–4.2 V under 0.1C, 0.5C, 1C rates, corresponding to 0.23 mA·cm−2, 1.16 mA·cm−2, and 2.33 mA·cm−2 current density, respectively.

The Li/LAGP-PP/LiCoO2 cells were disassembled in an argon gas filled glove box after 10 cycles (0.1C), 380 cycles (0.5C), and 450 cycles (1C), respectively. The separators and Li electrodes were taken out of the cells and washed with anhydrous DMC more than three times. The washed separators and Li electrodes were dried in the vacuum chamber of the glove box for at least 6 h for further test.

Three different separators were labeled as (i) pristine dry LAGP-PP separator, (ii) LAGP-PP separator after 380 cycles in Li/LAGP-PP/LiCoO2 cell at 0.5C, (iii) LAGP-PP separator soaked in the liquid electrolyte. The bulk impedance (Rb) was measured at room temperature by the Zahner IM6 electrochemical analyzer with an ac oscillation voltage of 5 mV in the frequency range from 1 Hz to 8 MHz. Each separator was sandwiched between a pair of stainless steel blocking electrodes of diameter 10 mm. The ion conductivity (σ) is calculated by

where d and S are the thickness and effective area of separators (i), (ii), (iii), respectively.

The cyclic voltammetry (CV) was tested on a CHI627D electrochemical analyzer using a CR2032 cell. In the Li/LAGP-PP/LiCoO2 cell, metallic lithium was used as the anode. The cutting-off voltage range was 3 V–4.2 V. The testing temperature was room temperature and the scanning rate was 1 mV/s.

The crystal structure of the pristine LAGP-PP separator was measured using a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation at a scanning rate of 0.5° min−1 in the 2θ range of 10°–44°. The surface and cross-section morphologies of the LAGP-PP separator and Li electrode were analyzed using the SEM (HITACHI S4800). XPS data was obtained using an ESCALab250 electron spectrometer with monochromatic Mg Kα radiation, and specific correction was conducted by using C 1s binding energy of 284.6 eV.

3. Results and discussion

Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of the pristine LAGP-PP separator. The pattern has a minor impurity peak corresponding to SiO2,[22] which should be attributed to the penetration effect of x-ray through the separator on the sample stage. The peaks match well with the PDF card of LiGe2(PO4)3 broad bands and no obvious shift of the peaks can be observed, although 25% of Ge4+ in LiGe2(PO4)3 are substituted by Al3+. This is due to the similarity of ionic radius between Ge4+ (0.053 nm) and Al3+ (0.050 nm).[23] Also the patterns show broad bands, indicating the glass nature of the LAGP.

Fig. 1. XRD patterns of the pristine LAGP-PP separator.

Figure 2(a) shows the cyclic voltammetry curve of the Li/LAGP-PP/LiCoO2 cell of the first cycle. A pair of oxidation and reduction current peaks is observed at 4.1 V and 3.81 V, respectively, corresponding to the deintercalation and intercalation of Li+ from the LiCoO2 cathode. The LAGP-PP separator is stable in the scope of 2.9 V–4.2 V.

Fig. 2. (a) Cyclic voltammetry curve of Li/LAGP-PP/LiCoO2 cell at a scan rate of 1 mV·s−1. (b) Impedance spectra of (ii) LAGP-PP separator after 380 cycles in Li/LAGP-PP/LiCoO2 cell at 0.5C (iii) LAGP-PP separator soaked in the liquid electrolyte.

The ion conductivities of separators (i), (ii), (iii) are compared below. The impedances of (ii) and (iii) are shown in Fig. 2(b). The ion conductivities of (ii) and (iii) were 1.5×10−5 S·cm−1 and 1.4×10−2 S·cm−1, respectively. Also, the conductivity of separator (i) was measured, but the conductivity was too low (< 10−9 S·cm−1) and beyond the range of Zahner IM6. Although the conductivity of solid separator (ii) is less than liquid separator (iii), its order of magnitude is the same as polymer electrolytes. These results encourage us that the dry SEI-LAGP-PP separator can be designed as solid electrolytes due to its acceptable conductivity. As the SEI-LAGP-PP separator was in-situ formed, it has good mechanical properties and excellent interface properties with the electrode.

Figure 3 presents the rate capability of Li/LAGP-PP/LiCoO2 cell at 0.1C, 0.5C, 1C, respectively. The initial discharge capacity was 145.3 mAh·g−1. The capacity retention can be maintained at 75.8% after 150 cycles at a 0.1C rate. Even at the 1C rate, the cell has better Coulombic efficiency, with a discharge capacity of 73.3 mAh·g−1 after 400 cycles. This is due to the fact that the dense artificial SEI were formed on the LAGP particles’ surface, and these stable artificial SEIs could prevent some side reactions at the interfacial layer.

Fig. 3. The rate capacity under variable current rate of the Li/LAGP-PP/LiCoO2 cell.

Figure 4 displays the surface morphologies of LAGP-PP separator corresponding to 0 cycle, 10 cycles (0.1C), 380 cycles (0.5C), 450 cycles (1C), respectively. The SEM images of the fresh LAGP-PP separator agree well with Xu’s work.[14] It is obvious that the separator is coated with LAGP particles, and the size of the particles is about 0.5 μm–1 μm (Fig. 4(a)). After 10 cycles, the surface morphologies of the LAGP-PP separator changed partially, seeming to be covered by a thin film, so-called an SEI film in the inset of Fig. 4(b). At some other areas, the SEI films were not formed, and LAGP particles were naked (Fig. 4(b)). After 380 cycles (0.5C) and 450 cycles (1C), no LAGP particles can be seen from the top view and both surfaces were covered by SEI films completely (Figs. 4(c) and 4(d)). After long cycles, the cavities between LAGP particles were filled with SEI film densely. The separator converted into an ionic conductivity separator eventually.

Fig. 4. SEM images of LAGP-PP separators surface after different cycles in Li/separator/LiCoO2 cell. (a) 0 cycle, (b) 10 cycles at 0.1C, (c) 380 cycles at 0.5C, and (d) 450 cycles at 1C.

In order to observe more directly, the cross section morphologies are also shown in Fig. 5. It shows that LAGP particles were wrapped by artificial SEI with a leaf-like morphology after 10 cycles (Fig. 3(b)), which is quite different from the pristine separator (Fig. 5(a)). This unique surface structure confirms that the artificial SEI films formed on the ionic conductor LAGP particles surface during the cycling process. After 380 cycles (0.5C) and 450 cycles (1C), the LAGP particles were coated with SEI films densely and homogenously (Figs. 5(c) and 5(d)). The cross section morphologies are in agreement with the surface ones.

Fig. 5. SEM images of LAGP-PP separators cross section after different cycles in Li/separator/LiCoO2 cell. (a) 0 cycle, (b) 10 cycles at 0.1C, (c) 380 cycles at 0.5C, and (d) 450 cycles at 1C.

The surface compositions of the LAGP-PP separator in the Li/LAGP-PP/LiCoO2 cell after 10 cycles were further investigated by XPS, as shown in Fig. 6. The C 1s peaks of 290.0 eV would be assigned to ROCO2Li, 284.6 eV and 285.5 eV peaks to other polymeric species.[24] The O 1s peaks of 531.8 eV and 532.8 eV are assigned to ROCO2Li and Li2CO3, respectively.[25,26] The peak around 687.7 eV of F 1s is assigned to the C-F and the 686.3 eV, 685.4 eV, 684.6 eV peaks to LiF.[27] All the results confirmed that the uniform SEI films typically consist of lithium fluoride and carbonates with various alkyl contents. It is observed that the Ge 3d peaks appear at 29.9 eV and 33.1 eV, corresponding to Ge1+ and Ge4+,[28,29] respectively. The reduction process can be due to the reaction of LAGP with metallic lithium, which results in the reduction of Ge valence and LAGP converting from the pure ionic conductor to the mixed conductor. Therefore, the continuous growth of SEI could be possible on the surface of LAGP particles and finally formed a dense SEI film on the LAGP-PP separator.

Fig. 6. XPS spectra of LAGP-PP separator surface after 10 cycles in Li/separator/LiCoO2 cell at 0.1C. XPS spectra of (a) LAGP-PP separator surface, (b) C 1s, (c) O 1s, (d) F 1s, (e) Al 2p, (f) P 2p, and (g) Ge 3d.

Moreover, this artificial SEI-LAGP-PP structure is able to suppress the lithium dendrite growth effectively. In most of the commonly used non-aqueous electrolyte solutions, Li dendrite is easily formed during the Li deposition at the current density above 1 mA·cm−2.[30] The incompact and dendritic Li can consume much more electrolyte and result in low cycling efficiency.[31] In this experiment even 2.33 mA·cm−2 (1C rate) current density was used to observe the surface morphology of Li deposition. The surface morphologies of Li electrodes at 10 cycles (0.1C), 380 cycles (0.5C), and 450 cycles (1C) are shown in Fig. 7. For the cell after 10 cycles at 0.1C, it is obvious to see that the Li electrode surface was flat and smooth, even some LAGP particles of the LAGP-PP separator were adhering to the Li surface (Fig. 7(a)). After cycling for 380 cycles at 0.5C and 450 cycles at 1C, the Li surface exhibits a neat and compact film (Figs. 7(b) and 7(c)), which offers a good condition for forming a high-quality SEI film. The needle-like lithium dendrites were not observed. Therefore, the LAGP-PP separator benefits from forming a uniform and compact SEI layer, and helps to improve the high rate performance of rechargeable Li metal based batteries.

Fig. 7. SEM images of of Li electrodes after different cycles in Li/separator/LiCoO2 cell. (a) 10 cycles at 0.1C, (b) 380 cycles at 0.5C, and (c) 450 cycles at 1C.
4. Conclusion

In summary, the artificial solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) was formed upon cycling on an ionic conductor LAGP coated PP separator. The LAGP particles were wrapped by artificial SEI densely. The ion conductivity of one SEI-LAGP-PP separator was 1.5 × 10−5 S·cm−1 at room temperature, which indicates that it can be used as a solid electrolyte. The uniform artificial SEI consists of LiF, Li2CO3, and ROCO2Li. The LAGP-PP separator in the Li/LiCoO2 cell exhibited good cycle performances even at the 1C rate. Also this artificial SEI-LAGP-PP structure can effectively suppress the lithium dendrite after 450 cycles at the 1C rate. All the above results prove that this novel LAGP-PP separator can convert into an ionic conducting SEI-LAGP-PP separator. This unique structure has great potential to be used in rechargeable solid lithium batteries.

Reference
1Whittingham M S 2008 Mrs Bulletin 33 411
2Arico A SBruce PScrosati BTarascon J MVan Schalkwijk W 2005 Nat. Mater. 4 366
3Tarascon J MArmand M 2001 Nature 414 359
4Abraham K MJiang Z 1996 J. Electrochem. Soc. 143 1
5Quartarone EMustarelli PMagistris A 1998 Solid State Ion. 110 1
6Masoud E MEl-Bellihi A ABayoumy W AMousa M A 2013 J. Alloy. Compound. 575 223
7Kim J WJi K SLee J PPark J W 2003 J. Power Sources 119 415
8Stephan A MNahm K S 2006 Polymer 47 5952
9Choi J HLee C HYu J HDoh C HLee S M 2015 J. Power Sources 274 458
10Croce FAppetecchi G BPersi LScrosati B 1998 Nature 394 456
11Kamaya NHomma KYamakawa YHirayama MKanno RYonemura MKamiyama TKato YHama SKawamoto KMitsui A 2011 Nat. Mater. 10 682
12Zhao YWu CPeng GChen XYao XBai YWu FChen SXu X 2016 J. Power Sources 301 47
13Luo FChu GXia XLiu BZheng JLi JLi HGu CChen L 2015 Nanoscale 7 7651
14Shi JXia YHan SFang LPan MXu XLiu Z 2015 J. Power Sources 273 389
15Wu Y PRahm EHolze R 2003 J. Power Sources 114 228
16Takamura TSumiya KSuzuki JYamada CSekine K 1999 J. Power Sources 81 368
17Hartmann PLeichtweiss TBusche M RSchneider MReich MSann JAdelhelm PJanek J 2013 J. Phys. Chem. 117 21064
18Mariappan C RYada CRosciano FRoling B 2011 J. Power Sources 196 6456
19Moller K CHodal TAppel W KWinter MBesenhard J O 2001 J. Power Sources 97 595
20Lu MCheng HYang Y 2008 Electrochim. Acta 53 3539
21Lee S HYou H GHan K SKim JJung I HSong J H 2014 J. Power Sources 247 307
22Cannas CCasu MLai AMusinu APiccaluga G 1999 J. Mater. Chem. 9 1765
23Inada RIshida K ITojo MOkada TTojo TSakurai Y 2015 Ceram. Int. 41 11136
24Bettge MLi YSankaran BRago N DSpila THaasch R TPetrov IAbraham D P 2013 J. Power Sources 233 346
25Sugimoto TKikuta MIshiko EKono MIshikawa M 2008 J. Power Sources 183 436
26Howlett P CBrack NHollenkamp A FForsyth MMacFarlane D R 2006 J. Electrochem. Soc. 153 A595
27Budi ABasile AOpletal GHollenkamp A FBest A SRees R JBhatt A IO'Mullane A PRusso S P 2012 J. Phys. Chem. 116 19789
28Wang XXiang JWang WXiong YZhang JZhao C 2015 Appl. Surf. Sci. 357 1857
29Kato KKyogoku SSakashita MTakeuchi WKondo HTakeuchi SNakatsuka OZaima S 2011 Jpn J. Appl. Phys. 50 10PE02
30Aurbach DZinigrad ETeller HCohen YSalitra GYamin HDan PElster E 2002 J. Electrochem. Soc. 149 A1267
31Miao RYang JFeng XJia HWang JNuli Y 2014 J. Power Sources 271 291